Being that, philosophy is concepts that cannot be explained in the empiricist and is pure theory. Other sciences even go the problem innumerable times, ties to certify its veracity, also has a difference here, therefore metaphysics does not work under simple concepts. Here it has the constatao of that it a posteriori has elements that they are a priori (REASONING) and (EXPERIENCE) of the knowledge. The citizen, to Observar it exerts on the object a power of which makes a collection of sensible data; through the sensation and of the perception. Thus, the mathematics and the physics for Kant had grown while science, when the scientists had perceived, exactly implicitly, that the reason is who commands objects and I do not oppose it (Copernicana Revolution). The agreement possesss of a priori or rational form the rules to know. Metaphysics is a priori and rational, it the sensation or perception is not given in. We can have idea of totality of world, God and Soul and not know it.

Kant considered similar inversion in philosophy. Until then, the theories consisted of adjusting the reason human being to the objects, that were, so to speak, ' ' center of gravidade' ' of the knowledge. Kant considered the opposite: the objects, from, would have there that to regulate themselves for the citizen, that would be the depositary of the forms of the knowledge. The laws would not be in the things of the world, but in the proper man; they would be spontaneous facultieses of its transcendental nature. As Kant it affirms in the preface of the second edition of the Critical one of the Pure Reason: ' ' So far one assumed that all our knowledge had that to regulate itself for objects; however all the attempts of by means of concepts establishing something a priori on the same ones, through what it would extend our knowledge, had failed under this presupposition.

This philosopher uses the kantiano term call disinterests for contemplation of the art where through this he will make with that this will is distant, consequently moving away to the suffering and pain. However this artistic contemplation does not eliminate and neither it will eliminate this existing will in the man who is something inherent its nature human being, being the man a being that always this desiring something, and when obtains to saciar in definitive area its necessary will to be satisfied in another one, in this direction the art raises and makes with that the man momentarily surpasses this moment of will and pain. 2. MUSIC IN the TIME OF SCHOPENHAUER Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) lives enters the end of a century and the start of another one where beyond occurring innumerable changes in the social context, politician, religious and cultural, the philosopher could also follow in its time changes in the musical scope, where he had the transistion of the Classicismo1 for the Romantismo2. The Classic period must be seen and also recognized as the moment where great geniuses of music if had detached, over all it agrees to mention great names as: Haydn3 and also Mozart4. It is pertinent to detach that Schopenhauer possua greatest admiration to both, over all the Mozart, therefore this despite its posterity withholds had a short life left a vast workmanship.

He was a composer who prioritized the technique and exactly with the metric one they were factors that differentiated its compositions. Already Haydn was considered as the father of the symphony, this for the fact to have composition a great number of symphonic parts and also its compositions were distinguished for the existing musical perfection in them. Music in the time of Haydn as well as Mozart possesss a universal character, therefore in the whole world when somebody dared to compose would have then to follow the existing musical standards, what in fact it made with that classic music if detached.

What we will see daqui in ahead in them will bring reflections a little less arbitrary, wants to say, will be, in fact, following a line of antropolgica and philosophical research, which in them demanded reading and understanding of diversions authors, mainly Cassirer. However, what we know is that we will not have, to the end of the research, resolution of the question for the direction and meaning of the man. But we think, and now a sufficiently personal thing, that the queerness that we cite before, this yes, perhaps can answer us more clearly. at the same time, does not have greater blackness in place some of the symbolic universe.

History and memory of Ernst Cassirer Ernst Cassirer were born in 28 of July of 1874, Breslau, Germany (the same city belonged to the Poland and was called Wroclaw in previous times). Of family it mistreats of middle class (its father, Eduard Cassirer, was trader), was still changed young for the city of Berlin, where it initiated its university studies, in 1892, in the University of Berlin. It initiated studies in right, and soon more one became involved with the reading of classic workmanships of literature and philosophy. Also it passed for the universities of Leipzig, Heidelberg and Munique, where it studied biological history, languages and sciences. In 1896, it knew Hermann Cohen (1842-1918) and became one of its students of the neokantiana line, in University of Marburg

In 1899, Cassirer defended its doutorado thesis of, that it dealt with on Discardings and the mathematical analysis the scientific knowledge (Discardings, Kritik der Mathematischen und Naturwissenschaftlichen Erkenntnis). At this time, Cassirer not yet had if involved directly with the antropolgico thought, since its main works mentioned the theory to it of the knowledge? following the tradition of the school of Marburg. In 1902, it was married its cousin, Toni Blondy, with who remained until the day of its death.