Radiation of the universe, is an energy that covers the entire sky and whose existence shows that the universe we know, began to expand with an explosion that we are all familiar with the name of Big Bang, makes trecemilsetecientos million years. So the beliefs of cosmologists, are not relevant for their work as researchers; many cosmologists have intense religious beliefs, and many others do not. Evencio Mediavilla, research on galaxies, said that throughout history there have been great thinkers and scientists believing and unbelieving. For him it is not inconsistent to be a good scientist and believe in God, but that they are two different things. Science is unable or need to seek God is not to say that you can not or you need to investigate what happened before the Big Bang. The scientific method itself, is limited only by science.

Everything that can be subjected to that method is scientific territory. Frieman said: the important thing is that science rests on foundations that can be put to test experimentally. It is legitimate that cosmologists to analyze what happened around the time of the Big Bang. The physicist Stephen W. Hawking, and other of his colleagues have explored theories that the universe is created out of nothing; possibility to difficult to test, but feasible. Today this topic cannot be terminated, since knowledge is still insufficient. For some scientists, the need for the existence of God emerges from science itself and is valid that this attempt to respond to religious issues. Astrophysicist at the University of Granada Eduardo Battaner says: today speak of God among scientists, seems to be a heresy, but the truth is that Cosmology always has been, and remains, a science that is very close to the limits, fundamental questions that all we do.

The stance which asserts that science cannot answer to whether God exists, does not seem sincere. In fact, today still discussing if cosmology supports a creation in the beginning or lol The Big Bang does not prove or disproves the existence of God, but it is a debate interesting and relevant; not agree with that that science and religion go by different paths; head is one, and everything, God and science, pass on the head. Battaner sees God as a kind of reasoning that can get out of Science (a God as a scientific necessity). Historians of science say that the work of the scientist, due of birth the same curiosity that did germinate religion. But at a certain point science carved his own path. I invite you to visit the Digital Library of where you will find articles of quality checked for your personal and spiritual development: health, sports, entertainment, computing, languages, labour output and more.